Oh, yes...
Feb. 10th, 2004 06:39 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
greenstorm(for those of you who like me because I don't do quizzes, and know that I reciprocate on that, this is the last one. I just needed something to be annoyed at)
The Sudden Departure
Random Brutal Love Master (RBLMf)
Sweet. Dear. Loving. At Gate 18. Final call.
You are The Sudden Departure.
You've been in a lot of serious relationships. More than a few have ended ugly. Uglily. Whatever. Our guess is that you're a really fantastic girl who doesn't really know what she wants, and you've broken a few hearts as a result. You fall for people easily, and you enjoy the feeling of falling in love, but once you're there, either boredom or the old "grass is greener" syndrome sets in. The mind wanders, and with it goes the flesh. And then the toiletries.
Your exact opposite:
The Intern
Deliberate Gentle Sex Dreamer
We know you're not the classic "love 'em and leave 'em" type, at least not in a purely sexual sense. You have too many serious bonding tendencies for that. But even though you're theoretically looking to settle down, you don't settle long on one person. "Serial monogamist" is probably something you hear a lot. "Emotionally loose" is another way to put it. To the poor guys eating your dust and sniffing your panties, it doesn't really make much difference. Of course, it's not really your fault that people get hurt. You have every right to move on when you choose.
ALWAYS AVOID: The Backrubber, The Gentleman
CONSIDER: The Vapor Trail, someone just like you
Hm. Maybe the test was confused because there was no polyamorous option? Like, yes, of course it would confuse them if I say I've had sex with three people in the last year and like long term relationships, because... duh? I'm in three long term relationships. My relationships don't end 'uglily' because... I don't come up with someone better than the current, and replace them, but realise that one can have the cake and eat it too, and I don't need to rank people in some sort of heirarchical order to decide which one I want to be with least?
Yes, I could be called emotionally loose. How can they call me a serial monogamist without asking if I subscribe to monogamy?
This being why I don't take these often. Either I'm marginal, as below, or I just don't fit the set of people they were designed for.
And, oh, yeah... avoid the backrubber? *grin* They don't know me very well, indeed.
The Sudden Departure
Random Brutal Love Master (RBLMf)
Sweet. Dear. Loving. At Gate 18. Final call.
You are The Sudden Departure.
You've been in a lot of serious relationships. More than a few have ended ugly. Uglily. Whatever. Our guess is that you're a really fantastic girl who doesn't really know what she wants, and you've broken a few hearts as a result. You fall for people easily, and you enjoy the feeling of falling in love, but once you're there, either boredom or the old "grass is greener" syndrome sets in. The mind wanders, and with it goes the flesh. And then the toiletries.
Your exact opposite:
The Intern
Deliberate Gentle Sex Dreamer
We know you're not the classic "love 'em and leave 'em" type, at least not in a purely sexual sense. You have too many serious bonding tendencies for that. But even though you're theoretically looking to settle down, you don't settle long on one person. "Serial monogamist" is probably something you hear a lot. "Emotionally loose" is another way to put it. To the poor guys eating your dust and sniffing your panties, it doesn't really make much difference. Of course, it's not really your fault that people get hurt. You have every right to move on when you choose.
ALWAYS AVOID: The Backrubber, The Gentleman
CONSIDER: The Vapor Trail, someone just like you
Hm. Maybe the test was confused because there was no polyamorous option? Like, yes, of course it would confuse them if I say I've had sex with three people in the last year and like long term relationships, because... duh? I'm in three long term relationships. My relationships don't end 'uglily' because... I don't come up with someone better than the current, and replace them, but realise that one can have the cake and eat it too, and I don't need to rank people in some sort of heirarchical order to decide which one I want to be with least?
Yes, I could be called emotionally loose. How can they call me a serial monogamist without asking if I subscribe to monogamy?
This being why I don't take these often. Either I'm marginal, as below, or I just don't fit the set of people they were designed for.
And, oh, yeah... avoid the backrubber? *grin* They don't know me very well, indeed.
