Alright. I'm not used to having a normal experience of something, but I may be having a normal experience of autism, now, as an adult, that many people are more used to having their whole lives.
So a meme went around a bit ago. The text was:
people think taking things literally is just like
-not getting jokes and sarcasm
when in my experience it's more like
-thinking you have to fulfill 100% of the exact requirements for something, when everyone else apparently knows it's actually a bit flexible
-SAYING something with a literal meaning and others interpret it figuratively
-following instructions to a T but not knowing how [you're allowed to] modify them when something goes wrong
-doing EXACTLY what someone asked of you and them getting mad that it wasn't what they meant or actually wanted [this feels very gaslight-y]
-being terrified of people's empty threats or hyperbole without realizing they didn't actually mean it
-[learning] all the connotations of different words so you can use them as precisely as possible, getting frustrated when others are inexact
A lot of this aligns with my experience.
For the longest time my work was pretty unambiguous. I worked hourly or by piecework, I did the thing, I got paid for it. Now I'm in this union environment which is not designed for folks who do either knowledge work or fieldwork, and the way folks deal with it is by being imprecise, by saying there's no flexibility but knowing there is, but knowing there's not too much flexibility. There are a ton of, I don't know if they're empty threats or not, but I suspect they are. And no one can speak plainly about it because when I ask literal questions they're figurative in response.
And none of this is about the actual work product. It's all about "is it ok to start lunch 5 minutes early and end it 5 minutes early" which is such bullshit to be worrying about. I'd rather worry about the fact that wildfire and the biologists have conflicting requirements for how much wood is left on a block and how to reconcile that, but instead I get resentful that I get my teeth into a project and if I take 10 minutes into lunch to complete something I can't just come back after lunch 10 minutes later without using vacation time, but sometimes I can, but we're not supposed to, so don't do it often because we're not supposed to but it's ok to do it a little bit but really we shouldn't do it but sometimes we do. So then PDA kicks in and says that since they don't care whether I'm working well or efficiently, why should I bother? I can sidestep the demand of having to work because my work is useful and often interesting, but having 8 to-the-minute time demands per day is defeating me (start, lunch, two breaks, and end time).
Then I do some spiralling around it because I'm not doing good or prolific work and it feels like a shitty use of my time. So, ok, I'm having poor mental health and I know some things to do about that: some grounding things, journaling, taking time to really root into my life and pay attention. But then more ambiguous rules stuff strikes: if I'm having a truly awful mental health day and can't work, does that count as sick for the purposes of sick leave? When they send out emails a couple times a month telling employees to do all these grounding exercises and whatever to care for their mental health, do they mean on the clock? Probably they mean "don't do it, it's not ok, but it's ok to do sometimes but not very often but it's actually allowed".
Which basically means it's something you're not supposed to talk about, which is isolating.
So, yeah, if autism is a thing where folks don't follow social norms right (among other things) then one of the big ways it presents for me is in interpretation of ambiguity. In a lot of cases I can throw the ambiguity out and society's ok with that: modern gender stuff, for instance, makes less sense to me as an actual thing than older more defined ones, but I can throw out the whole thing and folks are more or less ok with it. Mononormative relationships? Make no sense to me but I just don't do them.
Highly unionized (read: prescribed) work environment where folks socially kind of work around poorly worded rules? Crashing. Burning.
And it's making me think about how autism is supposedly also an issue of emotional regulation. The idea is that autistic folks can't regulate like neurotypical folks and they melt down or shut down a lot. But if you put anyone in a situation where they aren't allowed to know what they're supposed to be doing, what they're supposed to be doing is actually impossible for them, they don't know whether or not there will be punishment in any given second for not doing the thing they don't know what it is and can't do-- and then stop them from doing the mind or body things (stimming) that soothe them. Well. I think you get meltdowns and shutdowns, fight or withdrawal, and all the normal trauma stuff that autistic people evidence to the point where we do not know what autism looks like without comorbid trauma stuff.
So that's my weekend thought. Also some farm stuff but that gets its own post because it's happy.
So a meme went around a bit ago. The text was:
people think taking things literally is just like
-not getting jokes and sarcasm
when in my experience it's more like
-thinking you have to fulfill 100% of the exact requirements for something, when everyone else apparently knows it's actually a bit flexible
-SAYING something with a literal meaning and others interpret it figuratively
-following instructions to a T but not knowing how [you're allowed to] modify them when something goes wrong
-doing EXACTLY what someone asked of you and them getting mad that it wasn't what they meant or actually wanted [this feels very gaslight-y]
-being terrified of people's empty threats or hyperbole without realizing they didn't actually mean it
-[learning] all the connotations of different words so you can use them as precisely as possible, getting frustrated when others are inexact
A lot of this aligns with my experience.
For the longest time my work was pretty unambiguous. I worked hourly or by piecework, I did the thing, I got paid for it. Now I'm in this union environment which is not designed for folks who do either knowledge work or fieldwork, and the way folks deal with it is by being imprecise, by saying there's no flexibility but knowing there is, but knowing there's not too much flexibility. There are a ton of, I don't know if they're empty threats or not, but I suspect they are. And no one can speak plainly about it because when I ask literal questions they're figurative in response.
And none of this is about the actual work product. It's all about "is it ok to start lunch 5 minutes early and end it 5 minutes early" which is such bullshit to be worrying about. I'd rather worry about the fact that wildfire and the biologists have conflicting requirements for how much wood is left on a block and how to reconcile that, but instead I get resentful that I get my teeth into a project and if I take 10 minutes into lunch to complete something I can't just come back after lunch 10 minutes later without using vacation time, but sometimes I can, but we're not supposed to, so don't do it often because we're not supposed to but it's ok to do it a little bit but really we shouldn't do it but sometimes we do. So then PDA kicks in and says that since they don't care whether I'm working well or efficiently, why should I bother? I can sidestep the demand of having to work because my work is useful and often interesting, but having 8 to-the-minute time demands per day is defeating me (start, lunch, two breaks, and end time).
Then I do some spiralling around it because I'm not doing good or prolific work and it feels like a shitty use of my time. So, ok, I'm having poor mental health and I know some things to do about that: some grounding things, journaling, taking time to really root into my life and pay attention. But then more ambiguous rules stuff strikes: if I'm having a truly awful mental health day and can't work, does that count as sick for the purposes of sick leave? When they send out emails a couple times a month telling employees to do all these grounding exercises and whatever to care for their mental health, do they mean on the clock? Probably they mean "don't do it, it's not ok, but it's ok to do sometimes but not very often but it's actually allowed".
Which basically means it's something you're not supposed to talk about, which is isolating.
So, yeah, if autism is a thing where folks don't follow social norms right (among other things) then one of the big ways it presents for me is in interpretation of ambiguity. In a lot of cases I can throw the ambiguity out and society's ok with that: modern gender stuff, for instance, makes less sense to me as an actual thing than older more defined ones, but I can throw out the whole thing and folks are more or less ok with it. Mononormative relationships? Make no sense to me but I just don't do them.
Highly unionized (read: prescribed) work environment where folks socially kind of work around poorly worded rules? Crashing. Burning.
And it's making me think about how autism is supposedly also an issue of emotional regulation. The idea is that autistic folks can't regulate like neurotypical folks and they melt down or shut down a lot. But if you put anyone in a situation where they aren't allowed to know what they're supposed to be doing, what they're supposed to be doing is actually impossible for them, they don't know whether or not there will be punishment in any given second for not doing the thing they don't know what it is and can't do-- and then stop them from doing the mind or body things (stimming) that soothe them. Well. I think you get meltdowns and shutdowns, fight or withdrawal, and all the normal trauma stuff that autistic people evidence to the point where we do not know what autism looks like without comorbid trauma stuff.
So that's my weekend thought. Also some farm stuff but that gets its own post because it's happy.