greenstorm: (Default)
[personal profile] greenstorm
A chief subset of People Who Suck is composed of People Who Don't Leave Telephone Messages. Reasoning as follows.

My telephone kind of sucks. It rings twice and then throws people into the message system. That's not a whole lot of time for me to get it, which is just fine: if I'm not going to pick it up I don't want it ringing for hours on end.

My doing-stuff predictability kind of sucks. I do a number of things (gardening, dishes, laundry, sleep, etc) where I can't get instantly to the phone, nor would I be able to even if it rang more than twice. I also use the telephone sometimes to *gasp* talk to other people.

So the long and short of it is that sometimes I can't pick the phone up at somebody else's convenience, especially when they haven't called to check if it's a good time to call first. ;)

What have I done to deal with this situation? I have paid for an answering service/voice mail thing which will pick the phone up when I'm on the telephone or when I don't pick it up myself. I'm using money for this, paying for a message service.

Now, I pay for the message service so that if someone calls they can leave a message. This is convenient for both of us: first, if they need to convey important information they don't have to actually get hold of me; I check messages, the information gets passed.

More importantly, though, if they leave a message, I can check the message and call them back in a minute or two, when it is convenient and my hands are out of the dishwater or I've finished running up the stairs from laundry. There's a disconnect of a moment or two between the time it's convenient for them to call and the time it takes me to be ready to recieve the call, and the message system bridges that disconnect.

Granted, I will not always be home to call back in a minute or two, and I will not always want to, but the vast majority of my phone conversations will probably end up being because I've called someone back after missing the phone for whatever reason.

If someone does not leave a message, given that they know the above information, what must I assume about them?

1) That it's inconvenient for them to talk to me three minutes later than they want to. They need it now, baybe, and while in some cases that's legitimate the rest of the time it sounds like way too much control-freakishness and ego to me.

2) That they didn't actually want to talk to me. So, why call? I'm confused.

3) That they called a minute ago and left a message and didn't hear back, and don't want to spam my voicemail. Okay, I'll give you this one, although I still like messages.

4) That they're a telemarketer. Okay, fine, I don't mind you not leaving a message.

5) That they believe that I'm psychic and so don't need a message, because I know who it is (or want to pay more money for that *69 thing because I just accidentally misallocated my budget to voicemail instead of *69). Huh. Sounds like prime relationship material.

6) They don't know what to say. Panic-stricken at this new, unanticipated situation where they're faced with a machine, people forget their name and/or telephone number and so can't leave a message. Sure, if you were calling the Pope I'd understand this. Calling me, however, isn't a huge situation here.

7) Irrational stuff. For instance, people sometimes say, I didn't want to inconvenience you. Logically, if I didn't want messages, I wouldn't pay money for the system, right?

8) I don't think there are any raging technophobes out there who have moral issues talking to a machine, even one just used to transfer sound? But somehow the telephone's okay? I've never heard of this cult, I bet it exists in some form or another, come to think of it.

Having said this: I actually do still love you all. I love you more if you leave messages. Thus spake Larchstorm.;) The end.

Date: 2003-07-17 07:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greenstorm.livejournal.com
Yeah, I'm pretty good that way. :)

Being a random person on the internet and not a close friend and confidante, you have no way of knowing that my favourite activity is 'doing stuff' and my favourite reason for interacting with people is 'because'.

So, far from being irritated if you called 'just because,' I would welcome it. I'm actually trying to learn to use the phone for actual 'things' like a 'do you want to go out Sunday' call instead of just socialising, because apparently the Juggler prefers it to email for that sort of informational exchange. Go figure.

Too bad about the cult membership. They wouldn't take a supermarket stewing chicken instead, I guess?

Re:

Date: 2003-07-17 09:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lazarus7.livejournal.com
Excellent !! Stuff is good ... stuff is often one of my favorite things to do, but lately I have been spending my time doing things instead. Stuff seems to be taking a back burner to things. I might have to go to that place and see that girl about that time. It will be SWEET !!!!

The great thing is, I am not mocking you and am actually quite honest above (but deceitful below ... oh so deceitful ... and a bad spuhler).

I think the phone is really about being able to virtualize an encounter with someone. I often call for no reason whatsoever, just that the person in question popped into my head, or I happen to be driving near their house, or I thought of something funny to say and did not want to say it to myself in my car. Of course, the phone is also good for arranging Sunday dinner plans.

As for juggling email, it has been some time since I have received such an email ... a juggler based email that is. I have assumed that he does not love me and instead I find myself slowing weeping into the night until finally the sweet sweet oblivion of tear filled sleep sucks me deep into its
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<i [...] ...>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

Excellent !! Stuff is good ... stuff is often one of my favorite things to do, but lately I have been spending my time doing things instead. Stuff seems to be taking a back burner to things. I might have to go to that place and see that girl about that time. It will be SWEET !!!!

The great thing is, I am not mocking you and am actually quite honest above (but deceitful below ... oh so deceitful ... and a bad spuhler).

I think the phone is really about being able to virtualize an encounter with someone. I often call for no reason whatsoever, just that the person in question popped into my head, or I happen to be driving near their house, or I thought of something funny to say and did not want to say it to myself in my car. Of course, the phone is also good for arranging Sunday dinner plans.

As for juggling email, it has been some time since I have received such an email ... a juggler based email that is. I have assumed that he does not love me and instead I find myself slowing weeping into the night until finally the sweet sweet oblivion of tear filled sleep sucks me deep into its <I really have a desire to use the word chunky here but am not really sure where I can go with it ... probably a good sign I should stop>

Stewing Chicken ! ... I could send it to them ... or I could just tell them I sent it ... they could stew in their juices waiting for its arrival!!

Profile

greenstorm: (Default)
greenstorm

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78 9101112 13
141516 17 181920
2122 2324252627
28 293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 2nd, 2026 08:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios