Masking, or turning the volume down
Aug. 18th, 2022 08:27 amMasking in the autistic world is acting like someone else in order to survive within society. It may look like keeping your body in uncomfortable shapes, or uncomfortably still, to imitate other people's behaviour. It may look like professing different interests or emotions or thoughts than you actually have. It may look like imitating the people around you, or not participating much, rather than understanding what is going on. There are lots of kinds of masking.
A therapist said to me a couple weeks ago that autistic behaviours are innately human behaviours. They're just scaled differently and those shifts in scale are clustered differently.
Some research I haven't fact-checked says that parts of autistic folks' brains are more entangled, that we experience some things as connected that others do not, including experiences and physical pain. That seems to be true.
PDAers are often excellent maskers; part of our profile is that we are "manipulative" because we "use social strategies" to get what we need. The difference between a PDAer and a neurotypical "using social strategies" is that a PDAer "lacks understanding". This is the diagnostic criteria, which is pretty hostile towards the survival of PDAers (obviously if we didn't use strategies to get what we need we would not have what we need, but it's considered manipulative to act like a neurotypical while not being one I guess).
I've been an excellent masker in the social strategies department. I feel a lot of emotions and experie3nce a lot of things, and if I can get someone to tell me a little bit about what's going on for them I can empathize. Until recently I thought that was because my emotions were pretty similar to other folks'.
Now I think my emotions are much bigger than other folks'. My masking has basically involved turning the volume down on my emotions before sharing them, and selecting which set of emotions to share. I thought this was a social thing everyone did -- there's all this stuff floating around in the culture about how it's healthy to open up to friends about your emotions, which implies that many people do not open up, so I thought I was just like normal people in that regard.
With more data, though, I'm not so sure anymore. On the one hand I have a lot of folks around me who have trouble sitting with a friend's emotion: they would be uncomfortable with any expression of "negative" emotion I think if they couldn't immediately shut it down and end it? But on the other hand when I express my full internal sense of emotion, even if it's just through language and with no body or tone involvement, folks get really worried. People who know me more often have a better sense that this is my norm, but just regular folks? Not so much.
Thinking about this is unsettling and weird. It explains a lot about the world and people's choices? I don't know, I'm still chewing on this one and will be for awhile.
A therapist said to me a couple weeks ago that autistic behaviours are innately human behaviours. They're just scaled differently and those shifts in scale are clustered differently.
Some research I haven't fact-checked says that parts of autistic folks' brains are more entangled, that we experience some things as connected that others do not, including experiences and physical pain. That seems to be true.
PDAers are often excellent maskers; part of our profile is that we are "manipulative" because we "use social strategies" to get what we need. The difference between a PDAer and a neurotypical "using social strategies" is that a PDAer "lacks understanding". This is the diagnostic criteria, which is pretty hostile towards the survival of PDAers (obviously if we didn't use strategies to get what we need we would not have what we need, but it's considered manipulative to act like a neurotypical while not being one I guess).
I've been an excellent masker in the social strategies department. I feel a lot of emotions and experie3nce a lot of things, and if I can get someone to tell me a little bit about what's going on for them I can empathize. Until recently I thought that was because my emotions were pretty similar to other folks'.
Now I think my emotions are much bigger than other folks'. My masking has basically involved turning the volume down on my emotions before sharing them, and selecting which set of emotions to share. I thought this was a social thing everyone did -- there's all this stuff floating around in the culture about how it's healthy to open up to friends about your emotions, which implies that many people do not open up, so I thought I was just like normal people in that regard.
With more data, though, I'm not so sure anymore. On the one hand I have a lot of folks around me who have trouble sitting with a friend's emotion: they would be uncomfortable with any expression of "negative" emotion I think if they couldn't immediately shut it down and end it? But on the other hand when I express my full internal sense of emotion, even if it's just through language and with no body or tone involvement, folks get really worried. People who know me more often have a better sense that this is my norm, but just regular folks? Not so much.
Thinking about this is unsettling and weird. It explains a lot about the world and people's choices? I don't know, I'm still chewing on this one and will be for awhile.