greenstorm: (Default)
I'm still sitting on my autism screening. This part is a virtual "answer a bunch of questions and do a bunch of questionnaires" and, much like the ADHD screening I posted about recently, I want to answer a lot of the questions with "it depends" and "I need more information" and also "how am I supposed to know that?"

Josh was up last week and he said it's been super helpful for him to know about PDA. He said it gives him a framework for understanding me, my behaviour, and useful behaviours for him to choose. I noticed that this visit felt frictionless (I actually took a second to cry here) in a way that almost never happens for me with other humans. It didn't feel like a tremendous energy drain. It felt energizing and fun. I think that's because he had picked up on some tools to use, like... he'd stand up and say "I'm going to go work on the deck" and I could say "I'll be along in a minute, I'll clean the chimney right next to you" and then he'd go down, and I'd go down a second later and start splitting wood. So he wasn't trying to get me to do anything, just giving me the information (very helpful) and then moving himself to a place where I could choose to do something close by, and in this particular case it didn't matter what. So I announced one thing as a kind of "I'll go down and do something within conversation distance" but then could sidestep my PDA by doing a different ting within conversation distance and it was ok. There were other things we did actively together that also felt pretty smooth. It was really nice. And it was really nice to do things together, to not just talk, to experience Threshold together. It felt like such a connecting visit.

Meanwhile Tucker, who figured out that smoothness early on, has been more open about his feelings and what's going on with him. He brought an interpersonal thing to me that he was proud of the other day, something that involved saying no to someone. I've been watching his ability to make choices evolve over the years, to say yes or no to things, and for him to be actively proud of something and then to tell me about it (and specifically ask me to engage with it on that level) feels kind of world-changing? He couldn't share that stuff with me when everything was self-loathing, but now we can talk a little bit about his decisions and he can let me know what kind of feedback he's looking for. That adds a different kind of smoothness to my interaction with him, one where I'm not guessing what's going on with him all the time because he can tell me. It's lovely.

These are two people who have been working for years to be good communicators with me, and in both cases there are what feel like huge recent breakthroughs.

Meanwhile I have this autism assessment where I'm supposed to communicate something important and central about me, but I can only do it in writing in answer to specific prompts. I've been wanting to feel seen and understood in this assessment, to have it say "these are the ways I'm different" but effectively I'm the person doing the assessment. If I could straight-up answer the questions I wouldn't need an assessment, I'd know, right? The problem is that I don't communicate like other people, that when I use ideas instead of very practical operational data I can't communicate. My abstractions don't translate, and these questions are relatively abstract.

One possible solution is to answer the open-ended questions on here, which is my "communication with humans" mental space. Then maybe if I'm completely wrong in what I think is normal for all the "how do you do x or y different than normal people" someone will catch it.

Hm
greenstorm: (Default)
It's my firm opinion that NRE exists to get us through the tremendous amount of work required to onboard new humans into intimacy. It's both fuel and motivation; without it the process would be such a slog it would never happen.

I don't have NRE with A&E.

Struggles:

1) Being the practical one in the room, who requests numbers and fact-checks. I like to be able to hear about plans and figure that whoever suggests it will reality-check it themselves; otherwise every conversation is stressful because I need to screen what's said for viability and then call out that viability. When I bring it up A says that yes, they can learn to do this but it's obviously my role right now. Functionally, though, this means I need to set up all the checks-and-balances systems myself or else be hypervigilant about stuff until they can take it on. This is more about deciding if things should happen or not rather than how it should happen, whatever it is.

2) In relation to 1, keeping an eye on appropriate scale and timelines during the operationalization. Knowing that x needs to happen before y which needs to happen before z, if they each take n number of days then x needs to be done on this date, y needs to be done on that date. Knowing that we have xx hours to devote to things, so we must cut off talking about or devoting resources to y so there are resources left for z.

3) Knowing when something is a statement of fact vs a negotiation. I think this is a communication issue that goes both ways. E spent weeks on a couple map proposals for fencing so I assume she must be very attached to that proposal; I would have sent over a ten-minute sketch and asked if that's on the right track before working more deeply on the proposal. I say "it looks like there's not going to be enough money in the system, I suspect I'm going to need to work more than you said in the beginning, should I be looking into this job?" and they hear it as a statement of what'll happen rather than a proposed solution I'm hoping they'll add to. There are a bunch of these; it's not surprising because I have a ton of trouble with this stuff generally (see also: PDA, declarative language).

4) Setting and holding my boundaries, over and over, when pressed for time, in casual conversation, over and over: "no, I won't talk about that unless we have something to visually look at together" and "I can't do that now, I need to work". They don't push when I state the boundary clearly in the moment. They do the same thing again two days later, and I need to restate. This is probably very good for me; I find it super hard to catch dissonance before it becomes annoyance and then drives me to state the boundary at that point. I'd like to be able to notice and state the thing before it is uncomfortable for me so this will hopefully get better with practice on my end. I would also like them to remember after a couple re-states and stop doing the thing.

There was a lot of this last weekend, which led to me taking yesterday (the snow morning, 10cm of snow!) off and just reading a bit and going back to sleep. I feel reasonably recovered. I knew this was going to be a process. This is one reason I value my old friends and partners so much: we've done this stuff, I do not have to do it again, and I know they can make it through the process.

Profile

greenstorm: (Default)
greenstorm

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516171819 2021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 20th, 2025 08:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios